TTS API comparison 2026
Gradium TTS Beta vs SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 Gradium vs Speechify · text-to-speech for voice agents
Gradium TTS Beta ranks 1st of 112 with 76.8/100; SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 ranks 12th with 51.6/100: a gap of 25.2 points on the same public rules, built on Coval, Speko and Artificial Analysis.
Data checked on September 30, 2026 · Coval 30-day window ending October 1, 2026 · updated after each benchmark capture
Side-by-side benchmark
| Measure | Gradium TTS Beta | SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 76.8/100 | 51.6/100 |
| Rank | 1st of 112 | 12th of 112 |
| Real-time speed /60 | 58.7 | 19.6 |
| Voice quality /20 | 7.8 | 16.4 |
| Accuracy /15 | 9.8 | 11 |
| Price /5 | 0.5 | 4.6 |
| P50 / median time-to-first-audio Coval, 30-day window | 47.2 ms | 362.7 ms |
| P99 time-to-first-audio (slowest turns) Coval, 30-day window | 108.8 ms | 921.5 ms |
| Latency consistency (standard deviation) Coval, 30-day window | 16.6 ms | 388.2 ms |
| P50 time-to-first-audio, US East Speko | 100 ms | 85 ms |
| Accuracy: word error rate (WER) Coval, 30-day window | 4.5% | 4.3% |
| Pronunciation robustness (0 to 1) Speko | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Speech Arena Elo (blind listener preference) Artificial Analysis | not measured | 1239 |
| Naturalness (Elo) Speko | 1579 | 1573 |
| Price per 1M characters Artificial Analysis | not measured | 6.6 USD |
Choose Gradium TTS Beta if…
- → Ranks 1st of 112 in the overall benchmark, against 12th for SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2
- → Better P50 / median time-to-first-audio: 47.2 ms vs 362.7 ms (Coval, 30-day window)
- → Better P99 time-to-first-audio (slowest turns): 108.8 ms vs 921.5 ms (Coval, 30-day window)
- → Better latency consistency (standard deviation): 16.6 ms vs 388.2 ms (Coval, 30-day window)
- → Better pronunciation robustness (0 to 1): 0.3 vs 0.2 (Speko)
- → Better naturalness (Elo): 1579 vs 1573 (Speko)
Choose SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 if…
- → Better P50 time-to-first-audio, US East: 85 ms vs 100 ms (Speko)
- → Better accuracy: word error rate (WER): 4.3% vs 4.5% (Coval, 30-day window)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between Gradium TTS Beta and SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2?
- In the 2026 TTS API benchmark, Gradium TTS Beta ranks 1st of 112 with 76.8/100 and SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 ranks 12th with 51.6/100, a gap of 25.2 points on the same rules.
- Which is faster for real-time voice agents, Gradium TTS Beta or SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2?
- On Coval's 30-day window ending October 1, 2026, the P50 time-to-first-audio is 47.2 ms for Gradium TTS Beta and 362.7 ms for SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2; the P99 is 108.8 ms and 921.5 ms.
- On which criteria does SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 beat Gradium TTS Beta?
- SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 scores higher on Voice quality (16.4 vs 7.8 out of 20), Accuracy (11 vs 9.8 out of 15), Price (4.6 vs 0.5 out of 5).
- How are these two text-to-speech APIs scored?
- Both are scored by the same public rules: 4 criteria, 100 points (Real-time speed 60, Voice quality 20, Accuracy 15, Price 5), computed from three independent benchmarks: Coval, Speko and Artificial Analysis. A measurement a benchmark does not publish counts zero, and the model page says why.
- Can these numbers be checked?
- Yes. Each model page lists every measurement with its source and date, and links to the benchmark page it comes from. The rules are on the methodology page.