Aller au contenu

TTS API comparison 2026

Gradium TTS Beta vs Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS Gradium vs Google · text-to-speech for voice agents

Gradium TTS Beta ranks 1st of 112 with 76.8/100; Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS ranks 57th with 7.8/100: a gap of 69 points on the same public rules, built on Coval, Speko and Artificial Analysis.

Data checked on September 30, 2026 · Coval 30-day window ending October 1, 2026 · updated after each benchmark capture

Side-by-side benchmark

Measure Gradium TTS Beta Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS
Overall score 76.8/100 7.8/100
Rank 1st of 112 57th of 112
Real-time speed /60 58.7 0
Voice quality /20 7.8 5.6
Accuracy /15 9.8 0
Price /5 0.5 2.2
P50 / median time-to-first-audio Coval, 30-day window 47.2 ms not measured
P99 time-to-first-audio (slowest turns) Coval, 30-day window 108.8 ms not measured
Latency consistency (standard deviation) Coval, 30-day window 16.6 ms not measured
P50 time-to-first-audio, US East Speko 100 ms not measured
Accuracy: word error rate (WER) Coval, 30-day window 4.5% not measured
Pronunciation robustness (0 to 1) Speko 0.3 not measured
Speech Arena Elo (blind listener preference) Artificial Analysis not measured 1082
Naturalness (Elo) Speko 1579 not measured
Price per 1M characters Artificial Analysis not measured 9.2 USD

Choose Gradium TTS Beta if…

  • → Ranks 1st of 112 in the overall benchmark, against 57th for Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS
Gradium TTS Beta: all measurements →

Choose Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS if…

On the published benchmarks, Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS wins none of the measurements above against Gradium TTS Beta. This says nothing about features the benchmarks do not measure.

Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS: all measurements →

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Gradium TTS Beta and Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS?
In the 2026 TTS API benchmark, Gradium TTS Beta ranks 1st of 112 with 76.8/100 and Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS ranks 57th with 7.8/100, a gap of 69 points on the same rules.
Which is faster for real-time voice agents, Gradium TTS Beta or Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS?
On Coval's 30-day window ending October 1, 2026, the P50 time-to-first-audio is 47.2 ms for Gradium TTS Beta and not measured for Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS; the P99 is 108.8 ms and not measured.
On which criteria does Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS beat Gradium TTS Beta?
Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS scores higher on Price (2.2 vs 0.5 out of 5).
How are these two text-to-speech APIs scored?
Both are scored by the same public rules: 4 criteria, 100 points (Real-time speed 60, Voice quality 20, Accuracy 15, Price 5), computed from three independent benchmarks: Coval, Speko and Artificial Analysis. A measurement a benchmark does not publish counts zero, and the model page says why.
Can these numbers be checked?
Yes. Each model page lists every measurement with its source and date, and links to the benchmark page it comes from. The rules are on the methodology page.

More comparisons

Compare two other TTS APIs →